President Obama: NSA Spying Keeps America Safe, So Get Over It

President Obama will be on Charlie Rose tonight to chat about all the NSA spying that came to light last week. But ahead of the broadcast, PBS has released a portion of the transcript to Buzzfeed. Below is a portion of said transcript:

Barack Obama: Well, in the end, and what I?ve said, and I continue to believe, is that we don?t have to sacrifice our freedom in order to achieve security. That?s a false choice. That doesn?t mean that there are not tradeoffs involved in any given program, in any given action that we take. So all of us make a decision that we go through a whole bunch of security at airports, which when we were growing up that wasn?t the case?. And so that?s a tradeoff we make, the same way we make a tradeoff about drunk driving. We say, ?Occasionally there are going to be checkpoints. They may be intrusive.? To say there?s a tradeoff doesn?t mean somehow that we?ve abandoned freedom. I don?t think anybody says we?re no longer free because we have checkpoints at airports.

Charlie Rose: But there is a balance here.

Barack Obama: But there is a balance, so I?m going to get to your ? get to your question. The way I view it, my job is both to protect the American people and to protect the American way of life, which includes our privacy. And so every program that we engage in, what I?ve said is ?Let?s examine and make sure that we?re making the right tradeoffs.? Now, with respect to the NSA, a government agency that has been in the intelligence gathering business for a very long time ?

Charlie Rose: Bigger and better than everybody else.

Barack Obama: Bigger and better than everybody else, and we should take pride in that because they?re extraordinary professionals; they are dedicated to keeping the American people safe. What I can say unequivocally is that if you are a U.S. person, the NSA cannot listen to your telephone calls, and the NSA cannot target your emails ? and have not. They cannot and have not, by law and by rule, and unless they ? and usually it wouldn?t be ?they,? it?d be the FBI ? go to a court, and obtain a warrant, and seek probable cause, the same way it?s always been, the same way when we were growing up and we were watching movies, you want to go set up a wiretap, you got to go to a judge, show probable cause?.

So point number one, if you?re a U.S. person, then NSA is not listening to your phone calls and it?s not targeting your emails unless it?s getting an individualized court order. That?s the existing rule. There are two programs that were revealed by Mr. Snowden, allegedly, since there?s a criminal investigation taking place, and they caused all the ruckus. Program number one, called the 2015 Program, what that does is it gets data from the service providers like a Verizon in bulk, and basically you have call pairs. You have my telephone number connecting with your telephone number. There are no names. There is no content in that database. All it is, is the number pairs, when those calls took place, how long they took place. So that database is sitting there. Now, if the NSA through some other sources, maybe through the FBI, maybe through a tip that went to the CIA, maybe through the NYPD. Get a number that where there?s a reasonable, articulable suspicion that this might involve foreign terrorist activity related to Al-Qaeda and some other international terrorist actors. Then, what the NSA can do is it can query that database to see did any of the ? did this number pop up? Did they make any other calls? And if they did, those calls will be spit out. A report will be produced. It will be turned over to the FBI. At no point is any content revealed because there?s no content that ?

Charlie Rose: So I hear you saying, I have no problem with what NSA has been doing.

Barack Obama: Well, let me ? let me finish, because I don?t. So, what happens is that the FBI ? if, in fact, it now wants to get content; if, in fact, it wants to start tapping that phone ? it?s got to go to the FISA court with probable cause and ask for a warrant.

It's one thing to protect our freedom by invading our privacy, but where's the line in regards to the balance or tradeoff Obama is addressing? It's a more extensive answer, but at its heart it's the same one we've been getting since the first day the PRISM news broke. And frankly, it's still not satisfactory. [Buzzfeed]

Source: http://gizmodo.com/president-obama-nsa-spying-keeps-america-safe-so-get-513894610

Darla Moore newsweek Tony Scott UFC 151 empire state building prince harry Hurricane